The Feedback You're Not Getting: Reading Between the Lines

Back in my corporate days, I had a very complicated relationship with feedback. At best, I found it frustrating and unsatisfying. At worst, it was completely baffling. So, to be perfectly honest, I avoided it. And I most certainly didn’t ask for it.

I always felt this was my own personal failing. We’re supposed to crave feedback! We’re supposed to cherish it! Mine it for gold! Why didn’t I see its value?

But then, I would go to my after-work ballet class. There, I was constantly getting feedback, or “corrections”. I loved corrections! It meant so much that an instructor took the time to help me with my turnout, or my pirouettes, or my jumps. If I was having trouble, I would ask for it.

So why did I love feedback in the ballet studio, yet avoid it at the office?

All too often the work feedback was vague and/or inactionable. Sometimes, I had no idea what my manager was trying to communicate. I was left lost and confused and questioning myself. At ballet class though, corrections were direct, focused, and highly effective. I became a much better dancer because of them.

So, here's what I want to offer you: a working translation guide. Because vague feedback isn't neutral — it's coded, and once you know the code, you stop walking away from conversations wondering what the hell just happened.

Why Corporate Feedback Sounds Like It Was Written by a Legal Team

Before we get into the decoder ring, it's worth understanding why feedback gets sanitized in the first place.

There's a basic human discomfort of telling a capable, high-performing person something they don't want to hear, so what you get is feedback that is technically true, impossible to argue with, and almost completely useless for your actual career development.

This shows up everywhere — in passing hallway comments, in one-on-ones, in Slack messages, and yes, in performance reviews too. Research from Textio, a performance review platform, has found that performance review language differs systematically by gender, with women more likely to receive feedback focused on personality while men receive feedback focused on skills and results. Gallup finds that only one in four employees strongly agree they receive valuable feedback from the people they work with — which means for most of us, the gap between what's being thought and what's being said is significant.

So the vagueness isn't accidental. It's structural. And that means your job is to read between the lines with intention.

The Vague Feedback Decoder Ring: What They're Actually Saying

About Your Communication Style

This is where a lot of gendered feedback lives. The target is almost always your directness, your confidence, or the space you take up — reframed as a polish problem.

• "You can be a lot." Translation: Your personality, directness, or presence is making someone uncomfortable. Nobody will name who, or why, or in what context.

• "You're very passionate about this." Translation: You're coming across as emotional or difficult. The word "passionate" is doing a lot of heavy lifting to avoid saying something more specific.

• "Maybe just soften the delivery a bit." Translation: The content was right, but the directness didn't land well — usually with a senior man who prefers a more deferential tone.

• "You need to read the room better." Translation: Something about your timing or approach is off, but don't expect a specific example. This one is almost always delivered without one.

About Your Advancement

These phrases tend to show up in one-on-ones and performance conversations. They sound like guidance but function more like holding patterns — vague enough to be unchallengeable, specific enough to sting.

• "I didn't realize you were interested in that role." Translation: Your ambitions aren't visible to the people who make decisions. Whether that's a communication gap or a sponsorship gap depends on the situation.

• "We're looking for someone who can really own the room." Translation: You're not being perceived as ready for promotion, for reasons they won't name.

• "You should put yourself out there more." Translation: You're invisible to the right people. Hollow as advice goes, but the signal underneath it is real.

• "You need more time in this role." Translation: You're not being considered for promotion in this cycle, and possibly not the next one either. Ask what "more time" means specifically — because without that answer, it's just a holding pattern dressed up as guidance.

• "You meet expectations." (in a performance review) Translation: You are not on anyone's radar for promotion. Before your review is finalized, your manager sits in a calibration meeting where managers advocate — or don't — for their people. If your name doesn't come with a champion attached, this is often where it lands.

About Your Leadership Presence

Presence feedback is its own particular genre of unhelpful. It gestures at something real but lands without enough information to act on.

• "You could work on your executive presence." Translation: Something about how you show up is making senior leaders uncomfortable, and no one wants to name what it actually is. Push for a specific example — if they can't give you one, that's information too.

• "Sometimes it seems like you're not sure of yourself." Translation: Could mean anything from how you present data to how you walk into a room. Ask for the specific moment they're referencing.

• "You might want to be more decisive." Translation: Often appears after you've been thorough and consultative — the very approach you were probably praised for earlier in your career.

• "You just need to believe in yourself more." Translation: Completely useless without context, and places the problem entirely on you. If this is the feedback, the real conversation hasn't happened yet.

Damning With Faint Praise

This category is sneaky because it sounds like a compliment. And it is a compliment — for your current role. What it isn't is leadership language, and the distinction matters enormously.

• "Everyone loves you." Translation: Your warmth is noticed. Your leadership potential is not.

• "You always get it done." Translation: Your execution is valued. Your vision and influence are not part of the picture yet.

• "You're so easy to work with." Translation: You're accessible and agreeable, which is not the same as influential.

• "You're so reliable / dependable." Translation: You've made yourself indispensable in your current role, which can quietly become a ceiling.

The Non-Feedback Feedback

This is the category nobody talks about, and it might be the most important one. Some of the loudest messages are delivered through silence, omission, and behavior — with no words attached at all.

• Silence after a strong contribution, followed by someone else making the same point and getting credit. Not feedback, exactly. But a signal worth tracking.

• Being asked to take notes or organize logistics when more senior peers aren't. The ask itself is the message.

• Getting pulled into work that's below your level because you're "so good at it." Praise that keeps you exactly where you are.

• Praise that's effusive in private and absent in public. If your manager compliments you constantly one-on-one but never advocates for you visibly, pay attention to that gap.

• Losing access to meetings or conversations without explanation. Exclusion is feedback. It just doesn't come with a subject line.

What to Do with This Information

Getting clear on what's actually being communicated is step one. Here's what to do next.

Ask better questions. Most managers give vague feedback because no one pushes back on it. After any feedback conversation, try asking: "What would I need to demonstrate to be considered for promotion?" and "What's the conversation about me in rooms I'm not in?" Some managers will deflect. Some will give you gold. You won't know until you ask.

Watch for pattern mismatches. If your informal signals are positive — people want you in meetings, you're being consulted on decisions, senior leaders engage with you — but your formal reviews are mediocre, you likely have a manager problem, not a performance problem. If it's the reverse, something is off with how you're landing more broadly.

Find out who's talking about you — and what they're saying. Getting promoted doesn't happen because you did a great job. It happens because someone vouches for you when you're not in the room. If you can't name two or three people who would advocate for you in a promotion conversation, that's more important information than anything in your last review.

Stop accepting vague as final. The first version of feedback is rarely the real version. It's the safe version. You have every right to go back and ask for more.

A Word About Why This Feels So Hard

Reading between the lines requires you to believe that you deserve the full picture — and a lot of women in leadership have been subtly trained out of that belief. We've been praised for being low-maintenance, for not needing hand-holding, for not making things awkward.

Pushing for clarity can feel like being difficult.

You are not being difficult. You're being strategic. And there's a meaningful difference.

The women who get promoted are rarely the ones who received the clearest feedback. They're the ones who got comfortable asking for it, reading it accurately when it arrived coded, and knowing what to do with it regardless.

That's a skill. And skills can be learned.

Well helloooo there! Like what you see here? We'd love to have you as a member of the Expansive Woman Project. We provide content, courses, and community for women who are done waiting for their next promotion. Membership is free, and always will be!

Click here to join now!